由此 - 4 A A as it was her sister’s birthday. The applicant took her to an hourly hotel B B called Emerald House in Causeway Bay. C There the applicant indecently assaulted Miss X. On this occasion, apart from forcing Miss X to C masturbate him and perform oral sex on him, the applicant also rubbed his D E F penis against Miss X’s thighs from behind in a form of simulated sex. Again, some 10 photographs of a naked Miss X were taken by the applicant on this occasion. After taking the photographs, the applicant again forced Miss X to perform oral sex on him. G H D E F The applicant also kissed Miss X’s body, including her “lower parts” on this occasion (5th charge). G H I Defence case I J 10. J The applicant elected not to give evidence but called two witnesses. The line of cross-examination was along the line that he had K K done nothing improper to Miss X; that Miss X was angered by his L M revelation that he had married and she either fabricated all these incidents, or that such incidents happened to someone else. Miss X flatly disagreed L M with these suggestions. N N 11. The first defence witness called was his brother-in-law O O (“DW1”) who gave alibi evidence in relation to the 5th charge. According P Q to DW1, on 5 August 2005, his maternal grandfather was dying and he went to the Buddhist Hospital in Wong Tai Sin. He arrived at the P Q hospital at 12:30 p.m. and saw the applicant there with his sister (who was R S then the applicant’s girlfriend). DW1 testified that the applicant and his sister left the hospital at about 2 p.m. R S T T U U V V