The Anti-Corruption Law 24. The following persons shall not compose in the Investigation Board: (a) the person who concerned with the complaint matter; (b) the person who has hatred of the complainant or the accused; (c) the person who related to the complainant or the accused; (d) the partner with the complainant or the accused. 25. The Investigation Body shall determine a period and inform the accused person to explain, submit the evidence or burden of proof relating to the charge in carrying out the investigation. 26. The accused person may explain and defend by himself or by his agent in respect of the charge in the investigation made by the Investigation Board. 27. (a) The Investigation Board shall submit the report of investigated findings to the chairman of the Commission after investigating. (b) The chairman of Commission shall be held the Commission session within (30)days after receiving the submitted report according to subsection (a), to discuss and resolve in respect of that investigation. 28. The Commission: (a) according to the report of investigated finding; (i) may dismiss the charge of the complaint if it is assumed that no credible evidence arisen relating to the charge; (ii) may assign duty to the Investigation Board or the Inspector to prosecute the accused to the relevant court after issuing the prior sanction for the prosecution if it is assumed that he commits any offence of this Law; (iii) shall inform and submit the determination in respect of issuing the prior sanction for the prosecution under sub-section 2 to the President, Speaker of Pyithu Hluttaw and Speaker of Amyotha Hluttaw as soon as possible; (b) shall submit the report of scrutiny after forming and assigning the Preliminary Scrutiny Board in accord with the provision of the chapter IV of this Law, if it is found that any person is enriched by the bribery after scrutinizing the report of findings; (c) if it is assumed that the further evidence should be investigated may assign to the Investigation Board submitting such report or other investigation board. 29. If the accused is a competent authority, in a case of taking action against the accused person by the Commission and in the matter of determining to scrutinize by the Preliminary Scrutiny Board, such accused shall not be continued his duty to perform from the date of such decision by the Commission. 30. The Commission; (a) shall send his report, which is a matter of deciding to take action against a person who is a competent authority, to the President assigned duty under sub-section (a) of section 21 and to a respective Hluttaw Speaker assigned duty under sub-section (b) of section 21 and the complainant Page 8 of 14