5) the date of writing of the complaint (application) and the signature of the person (applicant) who has lodged the complaint (application). 5. The complaint (application) which does not contain at least one of the requirements specified in paragraph 4 of this Article shall not be examined unless the Inspector decides otherwise. In the event that the Inspector refuses to examine the complaint (application) due to the shortcomings of content requirements, the person (applicant) shall be informed thereof within five working days specifying the shortcomings. Upon elimination of the shortcomings, the person’s (applicant’s) complaint (application) shall be accepted for examination with the date of lodgement thereof considered to be the date of receipt of the complaint (application) meeting all the requirements. 6. In the cases referred to in subparagraphs 1-3 of paragraph 1 of this Article, the Inspector shall only examine complaints (applications) lodged by persons whose rights have been violated in the media or the legal representatives as well as appointed representatives of such persons. In these cases, anonymous complaints (applications) shall not be investigated. 7. In the case referred to in subparagraph 4 of paragraph 1 of this Article, the Inspector shall examine the complaints (applications) lodged not only by persons whose rights have been violated in the media or their legal representatives, but also complaints (applications) lodged by other persons, including anonymous complaints (applications). In that case, the Inspector may start an investigation on his own initiative. 8. Written or oral appeals, applications and notifications by the persons (applicants) concerned which do not contain complaints against the actions of producers and/or disseminators of public information, but only request to provide explanations, information or required documents, to express an opinion or submit a conclusion regarding the implementation of the provisions of this Law shall not be considered as complaints (applications). 9. The Inspector shall refuse to examine a complaint (application) and shall return it to the person (applicant) who has lodged the complaint (application) where: 1) investigation of the circumstances specified in the complaint (application) falls outside the scope of competence of the Inspector. In this case, the complaint (application) shall, within five working days, be forwarded to an entity of public administration which has the required powers and the person (applicant) who has lodged the complaint (application) shall be informed thereof. Where an institution competent to examine the complaint (application) of a person is a court, the complaint (application) shall be returned to the person (applicant) who has lodged the complaint (application) and the necessary information shall be provided; 2) upon commencing the examination of the complaint (application), it transpires that the complaint (application) in relation to the same issue is pending in court; In that case, the examination of the complaint (application) shall be suspended until the complaint (application) has been investigated by the court. The person who has lodged the complaint (application) shall be informed of the suspension of examination of the complaint (application). In that case, the investigation of the complaint (application) shall be renewed only upon request of the person (applicant) and upon notifying the Inspector thereof in writing;