CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

- مكتبة
- تسجيل الدخول

مرتبة حسب

تم إضافة التاريخ

61 العلاقات, 61 الكيانات

اختر الفقرة المستهدفة3

● ● ●

أوازي من إعداد:
CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law
مكتبة
تسجيل الدخول

معلومات
61العلاقات

The Case of the Rape Survivor’s Right to Be Forgotten (India)

Case Law

نصائح البحث

بحث النص

Type something in the search box to get some results.

جدول المحتويات

لا يوجد جدول المحتويات

لا جدول محتويات الوصف

The Case of the Rape Survivor’s Right to Be Forgotten (India)

Case Law

Country

India

Country Location

خط العرض: 23.078537445745496

خط الطول: 78.60363571015989

Country Location (مرتبط Case Law): India

Decision Date: 23 فبراير 2017

Case Status: أُغلقت / إنتهت

Case Outcome (Disposition)

Blocking or Filtering of Information

Keywords

Data Protection
Privacy
Right to be forgotten

Judicial Body: المحكمة أول درجة

Court Name: Kerala High Court

Case Number: Civil Writ Petition No. 9478 of 2016

Case Summary: The Kerala High Court in India ordered the Respondent, IndianKanoon.com, to remove the name of the Petitioner, a rape survivor, from a judgment in a rape case which had been uploaded on its website. The Petitioner also requested that search engines including Google and Yahoo remove search results about the case that mentioned her name. The Court recognized the ‘right to be forgotten’ and the confidentiality of the Petitioner under Sec. 228A of the Indian Penal Code as well as her right to privacy and a dignified life enshrined under Art. 21 of the Constitution of India. e judgment uploaded on their website. The Court did so to protect the petitioner’s right to reputation and privacy under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.

Columbia Global Freedom of Expression could not identify the official legal and government records because the judgment is no longer available on the Court’s website and other law reports possibly to protect the identity of the victim. Accordingly the information contained in this report was derived from secondary sources and it should be noted that media outlets may not provide complete information about the case.

Case Significance: This decision expands freedom of expression in the sense that the right to privacy is considered integral for the effective utilization of the right to expression. However, the decision’s reasoning cannot be examined in detail as the official order or judgment was not published on the Court’s website or by other legal reporters. In this sense, it might have been more conducive for open justice and free expression if the Court had redacted the petitioner’s name from the order but nonetheless published the redacted order on its website and also allowed legal reporters to report the proceedings in the case.

The decision establishes a binding or persuasive precedent within its jurisdiction. As a decision of a single judge bench of Kerala High Court, the decision is binding on all authorities and lower courts in Kerala.

Related Law

IN 1950 ConstitutionOfIndia
THE INDIAN PENAL CODE 1860

Source Name and URL: Global Freedom of Expression

Collection

Columbia

Date Updated: 3 يوليو 2024

المستندات الأولية

News article from LiveLaw.com discussing the case
English
تحميل عرض

لا مرجع

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

Country1
- Country1
Draft Law2
- Legal Document2
لا تسمية1
- Secondary Source1
Precedent57
- Case Law57

Create Reference

اختر نوع العلاقة

Original Law Cited
Related Translation
Related Media Source
Country
Related Law
Related Regulations
Related Secondary Law
Related Amendments
Related Draft Amendments
Related Case Law
Related Analysis

نصائح البحث

إضافة كيانات (أو إدخالات)/ مستندات

نصائح البحث

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.