Grounds of appeal The appellant filed originally five grounds of appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal. These were: i. “The holding that the summary of “Woes of an African Mother” in “Gateway to English for Junior Secondary Schools” was not a permitted use of the respondent’s work is unsupportable in law. ii. Their Lordships erred in omitting to make a determination on the appellant’s additional grounds 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. iii. The holding that the issue whether the appellant infringed the respondent’s copyright is a question of fact is unsupportable in law. iv. Their Lordships’ affirmation of the High Court judge’s award of general and exemplary damages in favour of the respondent is unsupportable in law. v. Their Lordships erred in not correcting the inconsistencies in the award and calculation of damages.” The appellant was granted leave to file the following additional grounds of appeal: “Ground ii Their Lordships wrongfully omitted to make a determination on the appellant’s additional grounds 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10. Additional Ground B The Court of Appeal failed to address the import of the provision in section 2 of Act 690 that the respondent did not have copyright in the plot of Woes of the African Mother or a summary of it, as in Gateway to English for Junior Secondary Schools. 9