shots, which have been placed on record by the Plaintiffs, show that the channel operators are brazenly using the name of the Plaintiffs, Plaintiff No.1’s image, and referring to the course material with her name. For example: 17. The Plaintiffs, thus, realized that amounts were being charged by one private operator who was running one of the private channels for sharing the Plaintiffs’ course material unauthorizedly. Pursuant to the injunction order granted by this Court dated 28th July, 2020, the channels which were being run earlier were blocked and now the said channel operators have taken refuge under privacy services and secret chat features to hide their own identity and have created new channels. Thus, the original works of the Plaintiffs are being transmitted on channels, which are created almost instantaneously, if an earlier channel is blocked. For example, the comparison between the earlier and new channels, has been tabulated by the Plaintiffs illustratively, as below: Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DEVANSHU JOSHI Signing Date:31.08.2022 12:12:31 CS (COMM) 282/2020 Page 10 of 51