9 conclusion and as to how that sum has been arrived, how does privacy loss amount to that tune of 10,000,000,000/=. See also the case of Ivanna FelixTeri vs MIC Tanzania Public Company Limited, Civil Case No. 5 of 2019, and since it will be on the discretion of the trial judge to determine the mount for substantial distress and loss of privacy the claim by the appellant are general damages and not specific. Also, the court in MIC Tanzania Public Company' Limited, (supra) the Court of Appeal provided specifically on the criteria used in determination of the Jurisdiction of this Court. The Court said that: ''if the suit does not highlight the specific claims and only has general statement of claim, then it misses an important ingredient which can enable this Court to determine its pecuniary jurisdiction. Such a suit has to be filed in the lower. " That being said, does failure by the plaintiff to stipulate the specific damages bar this court jurisdiction? I am persuaded by the assertion of the learned advocates of the plaintiff that the error of instituting it in the High Court instead of the District Court did not occasion a miscarriage of justice as it does not prejudice any of the parties. Page 9 of 12