the CAB back to Parliament for reconsideration, as he had reservations about the constitutionality of some of the draft provisions in the initial version of the CAB. Due to the delays in finalising the CAB, on 24 March 2021, the applicant, Blind SA, launched an application in the Gauteng Division of the High Court (High Court) for a declaration of invalidity of sections 6 and 7 read with section 23 of the Act. The High Court declared the impugned sections inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid. On 21 September 2022, the Constitutional Court in Blind SA I confirmed the declaration of constitutional invalidity of the impugned provisions, as they required the permission of copyright owners before their works could be reproduced in accessible formats for persons with visual and print disabilities. This Court held that these provisions were inconsistent with the constitutional rights of people with disabilities and held that requiring the permission of the copyright owners to create accessible formats amounted to a discriminatory barrier that unfairly prevented people with visual and print disabilities from accessing copyrighted materials. When considering the appropriate remedy, the Court declined to incorporate clause 19D of the CAB, stating that it was excessively broad and lacked the precision necessary for the specific case under consideration. The Court suspended the declaration of invalidity for 24 months and also made an interim remedy in the form of a reading-in of a temporary provision, that is, section 13A to be read into the Act, pending the enactment of the legislation. The suspension period was due to lapse on 21 September 2024. In the meantime, Parliament considered the President’s reservations and on 29 February 2024, completed its process and passed the CAB. On 2 March 2024, the CAB was submitted to the President for his assent. However, the President did not 2

Select target paragraph3