Lee Hsien Loong v Leong Sze Hian [2021] SGHC 66 agreement on various deals with Mr Najib. The following extracts from the Article speak for themselves: Breaking News : Singapore Lee Hsien loong Becomes 1MDB’s Key Investigation Target – Najib Signed Several Unfair Agreements With Hsien Loong In Exchange For Money Laundering It is believed that Najib Razak signed several unfair agreements with Singapore’s Lee Hsien Loong, like building the Singapore-Malaysia High Speed Rail when the country was in a trillion RM debt and a grossly under-priced water sale agreement, in exchange for Singapore banks’ assistance in money laundering 1MDB’s billions. If found guilty, Lee Hsien Loong and Singapore may be sanctioned internationally. […] Malaysian investigators are now trying to find the secret deals between the two corrupted Prime Ministers of Singapore and Malaysia when Najib was still in power. It is believed that Najib Razak signed several unfair agreements with Singapore’s Lee Hsien Loong … in exchange for Singapore bank’s assistance in money laundering 1MDB’s billions. If found guilty, Lee Hsien Loong and Singapore may be sanctioned internationally. Singapore was forced to reopen the 1MDB investigation after the Najib Razak dictatorship was voted out of power, despite closing it a year ago in May 2017. After Malaysians voted in a new government. The Singapore government was immediately summoned for questioning in Kuala Lumpur. According to a source closed [sic] with the dictator, Lee Hsien Loong refused to be personally interviewed. The new Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohammad has been keeping his distance away from Lee Hsien Loong after his election. Just last week, the Malaysian PM rejected Lee Hsien Loong’s invite for a holiday retreat and called for a bilateral discussion to increase water price. [Emphasis in bold original, emphasis added in underline] 30 The reference to the news sources cited at [26] above is not reliance on extrinsic evidence in construing the meaning of words, which is prohibited by cases such as Review Publishing at [29] and Bank of China v Asiaweek Ltd 15