Case 2:16-mj-01061-TJR Document 13 Filed 02/03/17 Page 29 of 29 (Gov't Reply at 21-22) (footnote omitted) (emphasis in original). Thus, ifthe court were to adopt Google's interpretation of the Microsoft decision and apply such a rationale to the case at bar, it would be impossible for the Government to obtain the sought-after user data through existing MLAT channels. In contrast, under this court's interpretation, Google will gather the requested undisclosed data on its computers in California, copy the data in California, and send the data to law enforcement agents in the United States, who will then conduct their searches in the United States. After careful consideration of the views of the parties and the many eminent judges who have addressed issues arising under the SCA, this court concludes that the two search warrants executed upon Google in the cases at bar do not constitute extraterritorial applications of the SCA. II. CONCLUSION For all the above reasons, the court will grant the Government's motions to compel Google to comply with search warrants. An appropriate order follows. BY THE COURT: 29

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents