affected by that measure. He pointed out that removing those contents from Google.com would imply deleting them from all global servers, so that an Argentine magistrate would have the power to decide on the contents that could be read and / or found worldwide through the internet. This circumstance would imply legitimizing, in turn, the possibility that other States also intervene in the exclusion of certain content in accordance with their own national laws, with the serious consequences that such a situation could entail. It warned that the proliferation and validation of orders such as the one criticized here, would generate a serious and serious obstacle to freedom of expression and the right to seek, receive and impart information freely, In short, it considered that the expansion of the The controversial measure should be annulled in order to avoid illegitimate interference in jurisdictions outside the territorial jurisdiction of the intervening magistrate. II. Thus set the framework of action for this Appeal, The analysis of the appellant's claim leads the undersigned to formulate a succinct review regarding the factual edges involved in the case under study. On March 14, 2019, the judge of the grade issued a order for Google to remove as search results of its web browser, those URLs that made reference to the arrest, in Mexico, of ES (son of EC). In that same notification, the URLs that should be de-indexed were detailed. As a consequence, Google called Arbitrary and incorrect provision of that command to the detriment of the search engine, since, as he mentioned, it should have been directed to the news portals responsible for the publication whose falsehood is alleged. Around this, he expressed that internet search engines are Signed date: 06/16/2020 Signed by: LEOPOLDO OSCAR BRUGLIA, CHAMBER JUDGE Signed by: MARIANO LLORENS, CHAMBER JUDGE Signed by: PABLO DANIEL BERTUZZI, CHAMBER JUDGE Signed by: MARIA VICTORIA TALARICO, SECRETARY OF THE CHAMBER # 34649449 # 260473037 # 20200616120654200