- 8 A B A that is a matter that should be determined at trial. There is no suggestion B that the plaintiffs would not be good for their undertaking in damages. C D C 24. In my judgment, the discharge summons should be adjourned D to the trial judge to be determined at trial. E F E 25. At this interlocutory stage, the court should consider whether F in the light of the evidence before the court and the plaintiffs’ case as set G H out in the ASC the injunction order as continued by L Chan J and as varied by Mr Recorder Whitehead SC should be continued until trial or further G H order. I J I 26. The plaintiffs’ causes of action at the interlocutory stage are for copyright infringement and trademark infringement. K Although there is also a claim for passing off, that is not pursued at the interlocutory stage. L The 1 plaintiff (“P1”) is a company incorporated and with its st registered office in Denmark. It was founded in Denmark in 1982. N P M N 28. O K L 27. M J P1 carries on business as a designer, manufacturer and distributor of jewellery products, in particular hand-finished modern jewellery products made from high-quality materials at affordable prices. O P As pleaded and as shown in the evidence, P1’s products are marketed and Q sold in over 100 countries. R R 29. S T Q The 2 plaintiff (“P2”) is a company incorporated in Hong nd Kong with its registered office at Suite 3607, 36th Floor & 3801–04 & 3812–14, 38th Floor, Tower 6, The Gateway, Harbour City, Tsim Sha Tsui, S T Kowloon, Hong Kong. U U V V