FAO No. 42 of 2016. 7. The learned counsels have been heard and the record perused with their able assistance. 8. The connected vested the petitions in the service Suspend the section Federal mobile which powers 8 of the through a policy relating to the adjudication provisions in licensed the the for consideration vested in of directive, Act of Federal 1996 to to involves’ Act to direct of 1996 are to The in the context Government under the Authority, orders and directions mobile 1996, jurisdiction empower pass of the to their customers. emerge Act and and or the Authority under the appeal power cellular services suspension the instant Government essentially of the is regarding providers the questions of controversy cellular services. interpretation particularly The of sections the 8 and 54(3) ibid. This Court is also required to examine whether the Policy Directive is in conflict with section 54 of the Act of 1996 and, if so, then the ensuing consequences. In essence, Court has to determine the scope of the powers vested Federal Government and service providers mobile of the Authority cellular to direct the services to this in the licensed suspend its would be operations. 9. beneficial In order to to examine answer the these relevant questions provisions it of the Act of 1996. The Act of 1996 was, inter alia, promulgated to provide