3 2018 at page 3 thus according to those cases and the provision mentioned this trial court does not fit the description as it lacks jurisdiction. He added that on the issue of the matters on the infringement of violation of personal data are required to be filed in the commission according to Section 39(1) of the Personal Data Protection Act, 2022, which provides that any person who considers that a data controller or data processor has infringed personal data protection principle may file a complaint to the commission, therefore the plaintiff was required to bring this matter in this court as an appeal and not as a fresh case. He also submitted that the plaint had two general damages only which denies this court jurisdiction as was discussed in Mangit Singh Sandhu & others Vs Robibi R. Robibi (supra) at page 8 and in Mwananchi communication Limited VS Josha K. Kajula and Others, civil appeal No 126/01 of 2016 page 16, 17, Richard K.N > Rweyongeza Vs Jitesh Jayantilah Landwa at page 12 where the court dismissed the case as it had general damages only and not specific damages. On his reply Mr. Kaunda submitted that this P.O has no merit and that the plaintiff claimed for specific damages at paragraph 3 with the word substantial distress and at page 5 on the prayers item (a) is a Page 3 of 12

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents