CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

- Colección
- Registrarse

ordenado por

Fecha de creación

62 relaciones, 61 Entidades

Seleccionar párrafo de destino3

● ● ●

Uwazi es desarrollado por
CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law
Colección
Acceder

Información
62relaciones

Google Inc. v. B.R.

Case Law

Consejos de búsqueda

Buscar texto

Type something in the search box to get some results.

Tabla de Contenidos

Sin Tabla de Contenidos

Sin descripción de Tabla de Contenidos

Google Inc. v. B.R.

Case Law

Country

Italy

Country Location

Latitud: 42.82063999428387

Longitud: 12.730955243111072

Country Location (vinculado Case Law): Italy

Decision Date: 21 jul 2021

Case Status: Cerrado

Case Outcome (Procedural)

Reversed Lower Court

Keywords

Data Protection and Retention
Internet Service Providers
Privacy
Right to be Forgotten

Judicial Body: Corte Suprema [corte de última instancia/casación]

Court Name: Italian Supreme Court

Case Number: Cass. Civ., n. 20861/2021

Case Summary: The Italian Supreme Court held that Google did not have to de-index search results of an individual as the individual had not provided details of the information he wished to be removed. After a lower court ordered Google to remove all results related to the individual as the information was no longer publicly relevant, Google had appealed to the Supreme Court. The Court acknowledged that the right to be forgotten can impose an obligation on search engines to remove information from its search results, but found that the request in this case was too generic and did not enable Google to sufficiently identify and de-reference the content which allegedly violated the individual’s right.

Case Significance: In clarifying that a request for de-referencing or deletion of content from an Internet service provider must clearly identify that content, the Supreme Court ensured that the obligation to monitor and remove content is not overly onerous.

The decision establishes a binding or persuasive precedent within its jurisdiction.

By clarifying that, when requesting the deletion or de-referencing of content from an Internet service provider, the claimant must clearly identify (possibly by providing the URLs) the content whose removal is demanded, the Court offered binding precedent concerning the procedural requirements of the request.

Related Caselaw

Google Spain SL v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos
SABAM v. Netlog NV, Case C‑360/10
Scarlet Extended SA v. SABAM

Source Name and URL: Global Freedom of Expression

Collection

Columbia

Date Updated: 3 jul 2024

Documentos primarios

Supreme Court Judgment (Italian)
Italian
Descargar Ver

Sin referencias

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

Country1
- Country1
Related Case Law60
- Case Law60
No existe etiqueta1
- Analysis1

Crear Referencia

Seleccionar tipo de relación

Original Law Cited
Related Translation
Related Media Source
Country
Related Law
Related Regulations
Related Secondary Law
Related Amendments
Related Draft Amendments
Related Case Law
Related Analysis

Consejos de búsqueda

Añadir entidades / documentos

Consejos de búsqueda

Notificaciones

Estás al día

La actividad nueva se mostrará aquí.