international importance. It was his allegation that he had been left confused with the Government's restriction on access to the Clubhouse. Having regard to the benefits derived by himself, the Respondents, and other Tanzanians on the use of such media it irked and prompted him to knock at the door of this Court seeking redress. He has decided to invoke the assistance of the Court to unravel the alleged mystery of continued control of access and use of Clubhouse. The Petitioner is asking this Court to grant several reliefs hoping to unlock his restricted fundamental human rights. These are: 1. Declaration that the ongoing restrictions on the availability of the social audio platform Clubhouse violate Article 18(1); 18(2); 20(1); 26(1)[ 29(1) and 29(5) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania of 1977 as amended (herein cited as CURT); 2. Declaration that the ongoing restrictions on access to Clubhouse without VPN is violative of provisions of various international treaties more particularly, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) Article 19; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) Article 19, and the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR) Article 9; 3. Declaration that the Petitioner and similarly situated Tanzanian citizens have constitutional rights to unrestricted access to the social audio platform Clubhouse; 4. Declaration that the Petitioner and similarly situated Tanzanian citizens have rights under international law and treaties to unrestricted access to the social audio platform Clubhouse; 5. Interim orders that the Respondents provide and facilitate unrestricted access to the social audio platform Clubhouse while the case progresses; and 6. Orders that the Respondents provide, facilitate, and continue to provide, unrestricted access to the social audio platform Clubhouse from the date of judgment. 3