residence and dwelling with some belting out PF-Party campaign songs. c. That there were massive acts of intimidation and provocations aimed and targeting the Petitioner by the 1st Respondent, such acts as purposefully and intentionally holding a 3-hour Road Show/Rally at the private residence and dwelling of the Petitioner whereas the Petitioner was relegated to remain hidden in doors as PF Party cadres and supporters surrounded his House and blocked in his Motor vehicle by parking other motor-vehicles around it. d. The 1st Respondent did in fact knowingly and intentionally commit an offence of trespass by entering private residence space and allowing his supporters to surround the Petitioner's house and occupy his veranda for a period of over three (03) hours to instill fear and ridicule the Petitioner in the eyes of all that witnessed the event unfold. e. Holding of a Road-show was both in breach of the 2nd Respondent’s code of conduct and specially set Covid-19 guidelines as well as a clear demonstration by the 1st Respondent to the petitioner that he had the muscle to muzzle him and hinder him from campaigning freely. f. Prior to the elections, and during the restricted campaigns that were held under very strict Covid-19 Guidelines of scheduled campaigns according to a calendar that was drawn by the ECZ, the 1st Respondent did conduct a PF Party