A A 7 B B The magistrate pointed out that it was not in dispute9 that it 10. C C was the data which had led the police to the appellant’s computer. D D 11. He also pointed out that, as was shown in the video recorded E E interview, the appellant knew that the Anonymous webpage was a F hacker’s webpage. As regards whether she knew that entering the web F page might result in hacker attacks, she made no direct admission. She G just said, ‘mainly wanted to see what kind of page they were doing’. 10 H I H The magistrate came to the following conclusions11 based 12. 12 on his understanding of what was admitted J G I by the appellant during the video recorded interview: K J K (a) L the appellant knew that Anonymous is an international hacker group webpage; M (b) she knowingly logged in; (c) she learnt from the webpage that it was to show N sympathy and support for the students who went out to protest; O (d) P (e) M N O she also learnt that the webpage had indicated that it would hack certain websites; Q L she had checked and knew that those websites P Q still existed, in other words, she knew which R websites were the targets of attack after her checking; S T U S 9 This is only to the understanding of the magistrate. T 10 See counter 244 of the transcript of the interview. See paragraph 6 of this judgment. See paragraph 21 of the statement of findings. U 11 12 V R V