with Article 79 The defendants respond in terms of Article 113 and 114 in connection Law on Public lnformation and Media. Decidingontheamountofnon-materialdamageawardedtotheplaintiffdueto with Article violation of personal dignity - honor and reputation, the court is in accordance plaintiff is the director of 200 had in mind all the circumstances of the specific case: that the against the Security lnformation Agency whose task, among other things' is the fight very title of the text the organized ciime, that he is the holder of a high position, that in the is factually stated where assertion about his connection with criminal groups from Kruievac from the the plaintiff iS from, that due to such a title and interpretation of the statements damaged' wiretapped conversations, the reputation of the plaintiff and the employees was aforementioned the and that they asked him a large number of questions in connection with information, that the same was reflected in his family, and for him personally is devastating is corrupt, and on the because it is emphasized that he protects criminal groups, and that he he has an other hand, taking into account that the plaintiff is a public figure, and that so he conclud ed that th e amou nt o b ligation of tolerance to suffer a stronger level of criticism, of roo,ooo.oo dinars on the name of the requested type of non-material damage represents plaintiff as a result of adequate fair monetary compensation for the damage suffered by the the actions of the defendants. the amount of com pensation awarded to the p laintiff in terms of Article judgment until 2.77 of the Law on Contract and Torts also includes interest from the day of payment. with rega rd to ln view of the above, it was decided as in the first paragraph of the sentence. Article The decision from the second paragraph ofthe sentence was made by applying 400,000.00 dinars, 200 ofthe Law of Contract and Torts, given that the award of an amount of to the bearing in mind the degree of violation of the protected property, would be contrary purpose of compensation for non-material damages, and would thereby favor aspirations that are not compatible with its nature and social purpose. Also, the plaintiff is not entitled to interest on the amount awa rd ed in the first pa ragra ph of the sentence, for the period from of the day the lawsuit was filed until october 3,2022.Yeat, bearing in mind that the amount judgment' damage suffered by the plaintiff was determined on the day of the Bearinginmindthattheplaintiff.sclaimwaspartiallyacceptedinthepartrelatedto due to the compensation for non-material damage due to injury to honor and reputation publication of information, the plaintiff's request for the publication of the introduction and Law on Public sentence of the verdict was also accepted, and based on Article 200 of the in relation lnformation and Media and Article 199 0f the Law of contract and Torts and that to the defendant Stevan Dojtinovii, who as editor-in-chief is passively legitimized in of the Law on Public connection with such a request of the plaintiff in terms of Article 120 journalists, the claim lnformation and Media, while in relation to media publishers and media in this part was rejected, because, [end of eleventh Fle,trrjrua S (aruaprplr?r