CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

- Bibliothèque
- S'identifier

Trié par

Date ajoutée

79 Relations, 78 Entités

Sélectionner le paragraphe cible3

● ● ●

Uwazi est développé par
CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law
Bibliothèque
Connexion

Info
79Relations

Does our past have a right to be forgotten by the Internet? Case-law on the So-Called Right to be Forgotten

Analysis

Astuces de recherche

Recherche de texte

Type something in the search box to get some results.

Table des matières

Aucune table des matières

Aucune description de Table des matières

Does our past have a right to be forgotten by the Internet? Case-law on the So-Called Right to be Forgotten

Analysis

Analysis Format: Report

Country

Argentina
Belgium
Brazil
Chile
China
Colombia
France
Germany
Hong Kong
India
Israel
Italy
Japan
Mexico
Netherlands
Peru
Spain
Turkey
United Kingdom
United States

Keywords

Defamation / Reputation
Intermediary Liability
Privacy
Public Interest
Public Officials
Right to be Forgotten

Author: Ramiro Álvarez Ugarte, editor

Source Name: Columbia Global Freedom of Expression

Source URL (legacy): https://globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Right-to-Be-Forgotten_NEW-1.pdf

Description: This latest paper in the Special Collection of Case on Freedom of Expression series shows how judges around the globe are dealing with the challenges posed to the social processes of memory and forgetting on the Internet, by the easy availability of information in perpetuity that was unknown in the previous non-digital era. The report highlights the constitutional challenges of these new rights-claims from the standpoint of freedom of expression, the new grounds that rights-claimants have sought to open and the basis found by judges around the world to dismiss or to accept the petitions based on the so-called right to be forgotten. The paper explores a broad range of court decisions to illustrate the jurisdictional complexities of de-indexing and its transnational impact, as well as courts’ legal reasoning when balancing freedom of expression with privacy, intermediary liability, reputation and the special duties of public figures.

Related Caselaw

[Name Redacted] v. Registrar General
A & B v. Ediciones El Pais
Abreu v. Google
Anonymous Applicant v. Federal Board of Conciliation and Arbitration
Anonymous Applicant v. Google Mexico
Biancardi v. Italy
Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Lecce v. Salvatore Manni
Communications Consultant v. Süddeutsche Zeitung
Don Alfonso v. Google Spain
Don Dionisio v. Google
Don Segundo v. Google LLC
Donlisander Communication S.r.l.s. v. S.A.
DPN vs. Google Brasil Internet Ltda
Fressoz and Roire v. France
G.W. v. Gannett Co.
GC, AF, BH, ED v. National Commission on Informatics and Liberty (CNIL)
Gloria v. Google y El Tiempo (Derecho al olvido)
Google Inc. v. B.R.
Google LLC v. National Commission on Informatics and Liberty (CNIL)
Google LLC. v. Audiencia Nacional
Google Spain SL v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos
Google Spain, S.L. v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (Spanish Data Protection Agency)
Graziani v. El Mercurio
Hashavim H.P.S. Business Data v. Directorate of Courts
Hurbain v. Belgium
Jurandir v. Globo
Khan v. Quintillion Business Media
Kimel v. Argentina
M. L. v. Germany
Manni v. Camera di Commercio Lecce
Martínez v. Google
Maureira Álvarez v. Google
MT v. OY, HTG, MA & A. Ltd.
Natalia Denegri v. Google Inc. (Supreme Court)
Nelson Curi et al v. Globo Comunicação e Participações S/A
NT1 and NT2 v. Google LLC
P.H. v. O.G.
P.M.F. v. RCS Mediagroup
Plaintiff v. Google Netherlands BV
Plaintiff X v. Google
Plaintiff X v. Google Inc. or Google Perú S.R.L.
Plaintiff X v. Newspaper X
Plaintiff X v. PrimaDaNoi
R.M.R. v. Agenzia delle Entrate
Ren Jiayu and Beijing Baidu Netcom Technology Co., Ltd.
Rodriguez v. Google Inc.
Rout v. State of Odisha
S.G. v. Unione Sarda S.P.A.
Surgeon v. Court of Appeals of Santiago
The Case of Enrique Santos (Fake News)
The Case of Mrs. B
The Case of N.B.B.
The Case of Revista Fortuna
The Case of the Rape Survivor’s Right to Be Forgotten (India)
The Case of Yahoo!Emea Limited and Yahoo!Italia s.r.l. v. Italian Data Protection Authority
Venditti v. Rai
X v. Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data
X v. YouTube

Collection

Columbia

Date Updated: 18 juin 2024

Documents principaux

Right-to-Be-Forgotten_NEW-1.pdf
English
Télécharger Vue

Pas de références

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

Country20
- Country20
Aucune étiquettes1
- Case Law1
Related Case Law58
- Case Law58

Create Reference

Sélectionner le type de relation

Original Law Cited
Related Translation
Related Media Source
Country
Related Law
Related Regulations
Related Secondary Law
Related Amendments
Related Draft Amendments
Related Case Law
Related Analysis

Astuces de recherche

Ajouter des entités / documents

Astuces de recherche

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.