Précédent 2 / 2 Next

‫واﻟﺤﻜﻢ ﻣﺠﺪداً ﺑﻘﺒﻮل اﻟﺪﻓﻊ اﻟﺸﻜﻠﻲ اﻟﻤﺜﺎر ﻟﻨﺎﺣﯿﺔ ﻋﺪم اﺧﺘﺼﺎص ﻣﺤﻜﻤﺔ اﻟﻤﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎت ﻟﺮؤﯾﺔ اﻟﺪﻋﻮى‬ ‫وﺑﺎﻟﺘﺎﻟﻲ رد اﻟﺪﻋﻮى ﻟﻌﺪم اﺧﺘﺼﺎص ﻣﺤﻜﻤﺔ اﻟﻤﻄﺒﻮﻋﺎت ﻟﺮؤﯾﺘﻬﺎ‪،‬‬ ‫ﻣﺤﻜﻤﺔ اﻟﺘﻤﯿﯿﺰ ‪ -‬اﻟﺘﺎﺳﻌﺔ ‪ -‬رﻗﻢ ‪ 22‬ﺗﺎرﯾﺦ ‪5/5/2015‬‬ ‫اﻟﺮﺋﯿﺲ ﺟﺎن ﻋﯿﺪ‪ ،‬اﻟﻤﺴﺘﺸﺎران ﻣﺎدي ﻣﻄﺮان وﺟﺎن ﻣﺎرك ﻋﻮﯾﺲ‬

Sélectionner le paragraphe cible3

● ● ●

Court of Cassation 5.5.2015

Case Law

Country

Lebanon

Country Location

Latitude: 33.97895463913212

Longitude: 35.75388908386231

Country Location (Lié Case Law): Lebanon

Decision Date: 5 mai 2015

Case Status: Affaire Résolue

Keywords

Defamation
Freedom of Expression
Online Forum
Penal Code
Publications
Social Media

Judicial Body: Suprême (cour d'appel de dernière instance)

Court Name: Court of Cassation

Case Number: 22/2015

Case Summary: The court found that any writing on a social media platform is not subject to the Publications Law, but to the Penal Code. In particular, the court held that Facebook is not a "publication" in terms of the Publications Law. However, the same Court of Cassation changed its reasoning and solution after a year.

Case Significance: The decision does not establish a binding or persuasive precedent within its jurisdiction. The significance of this case is undetermined at this point in time.

Related Caselaw (self)

Court of Cassation 5.5.2015

Related Law

Notes: Official government or legal records of this case are currently unavailable online.

Collection

SMEX

Date Updated: 1 août 2024

Documents principaux

Court of Cassation Decision
Arabic
Télécharger Vue

CYRILLA: Global Digital Rights Law

Sélectionner le paragraphe cible3

Court of Cassation 5.5.2015

Documents principaux

Notifications