should provide adequate safeguards against arbitrary decisions and effective controls against abuse by those in authority when excising the law and, it must not be more than is reasonably necessary to achieve the legitimate object and added a test from the case of Daudi Pete (supra) that it should be a corollary of the reality of co-existence of rights and duties of the individual on the one hand and the collective or communitarian rights and duties of the society on the other as also stated again in Kukutia's case (Supra) at page 166. Also the case of India of Maneka Gandhi (Supra) and a test in the decision of Eastern African Court of Justice in Civil Reference No. 2 of 2017 between Media Council of Tanzania & 2 others vs Attorney General of United Republic of Tanzania at page 27. In determining whether the argument raised above falls within the parameters set in the above authorities. We are in agreement with the position laid down in the above cases especially of Kukutia Ole Pumbuni (Supra) and it is our finding that the alleged law does meet the said criteria. First of all, the law giving power to the Director under section 9 (b) is one of the safeguards that when one individual enjoys his rights and freedoms. Such exercise should be with due regard to the rights and freedoms of others, collective security, morality, public 19