-t
''.--u
H))
emphasizes the plaintiff only. ln this regard,
n6#raropped conversation itself, while the title
of the defendant Milica vojinovii in the part in which
no,
-rn"
-"ril{;;;;";;
the
".."p,,r,r",estimony
:SyP
r,.i"a i6r, the title reflected the content of the news itself, precisely considering
the text given in this way was
volume of the news itself. ln support of the fact that the title of
readers' the testim o ny
given precisely in order to attract as much attention as possible to the
portal, and that in the majority of
of the defendant Milica Vojinovi6 that it is an electronic
casesthetitleandthebeginningofthetextitselfcanbeseenbeforeopeningtheentiretext.
but regardless of that, the title
This is exactly what attracts thelttention of average readers,
ofthetextcannotbesuchthat,asinformation,itinsultsthehonorandreputationofthe
persontowhomitrefers,becauseitactuallyrepresentsastatementthatthepersontowhom
itrefersisbehavinginanimpermissibleandillegalmanner/andtheinformationpublishedin
thiswayinthisparticularcaserepresentsajournalist,sinterpretationoftheevidence
journalist is to faithfully
presented in the criminal proceedings, even though the task of the
conveytheinformationfromthemaintrialinwhichheispresentandnottointerpretthe
pr.run,.devidence.lnaddition,directlybelowthetitleofthetext'photographsofToran
itself
iotii a nd th e p laintiff were published next to each other, which also em phasizes the title
of the connection
and the relevant information where the plaintiff is placed in the context
with the Kruievac criminal grouP.
Furthermore,thetextinquestionrepresentsreportingfromatrialinacriminal
genre
proceeding and as such belongs to the factographically journalistic
- a report whose
reporting from a criminal
basis is an event about which the audience is informed, in this case
the actors
proceeding. As a rule, the journalist is present at the event being reported on and
the trial, in addition
ofthe event are quoted in the reports. lt i5 true that when reporting from
journalist has the right to interpret the
to faithfully conveying the published information, the
publication of harmful
same, but that interpretation cannot be such that it represents the
information.Namely,inthetextinquestion,thefirstsentencereads,'TheDirectorofthe
the payroll of the
Security lnformation Agency, Bratislav Gaiii was on the cauldron' i e on
group'" The
criminal
well-known Kruievac criminal Zoran Jotii Jotka, claims a member of this
Jotka"
part ofthis sentence "i.e. on the payroll ofthe well-known Kru!evac criminal Zoran Jotii
phrase'
,uprur.n,r, as stated bythe defendant Milica Vojinovii, her interpretation ofthe said
expression ',to be
However, in the further course of the text, it is again announced that the
onthecauldron'.meansthatthispersonreceivesmoneyfromsomeone.Asthedefendant
cauldron" is an expression
stevan Dojainovii himself pointed out that the expression "on the
part of his testimony that the
whose meaning is generally known, it is contradictory to
d efendants gave
[end of tenth Poge]
7L
a
so if
n additional explan ation of th is expression. This is especially
it
is
taken into accou nt that
inclosepartsofthetexttheexplanationisgiventwice,andifitisassumedthatitsmeaning
nttlt'lt-:':i-'i::l:
this kind of interpretation by"the defendants is
t'blt-tlt::i1.i-:i:
ptJint;ff's honor and reputation. following the above, the verv tnf."f lh "
in the context and
344.\
twice interpreted meaning of the expression "on the cauldron"
r
and
plaintiff's
honor
the
to
in.iury
cause
to
which the defendants did it are eligible
is generally known, then
i.e6ojua
Camapu rrti
Ss