A A 2 B B Charge 2 is an alternative charge to Charge 1. C D C 2. The defendant pleaded not guilty to both two charges in D Eastern Magistracy and was convicted of Charge 1 after trial by the E E Deputy Magistrate (hereinafter Magistrate). F She sought to appeal against her conviction. F G G The Prosecution Case H I H 3. The Prosecution alleged that the appellant on or about the 4th I day of October 2014, in Hong Kong, without lawful excuse damaged J K property belonging to another, namely the webserver of www.police.gov.hk, intending to damage such property or being reckless J K as to whether such property would be damaged. L M L 4. In the original trial, the Prosecution called the following four M witnesses to testify: N N PW1: Au Yeung Chi Yung, an employee of Hewlett- O O Packard Hong Kong (HP), HP is a government P contractor responsible for managing the daily activities and operations of the government’s Q P Q Central Internet Services (CIS); R R PW2: police officer 8276, team member of the Technology S S Crime Division; T T 1 U V Contrary to section 59 (1A) & 60 (1) of the Crimes Ordinance, Chapter 200 of the Laws of Hong Kong. 2 Contrary to section 161(1)(a) of the Crimes Ordinance, Chapter 200 of the Laws of Hong Kong. U V