A A 3 B B C C PW3: police officer 6158, computer forensics expert3; D D PW4: senior police inspector Lam Ka Chun, computer E E forensics and analysis expert4. F F The witness statements of the above 4 witnesses were G G produced in evidence pursuant to section 65B of the Criminal Procedure H Ordinance5. They also testified in court respectively. H I I 5. J In the original trial, apart from the evidence given by J witnesses, the following facts were also admitted: K K (1) L According to the statement of Au Yeung Chi Yung, the Site Manager of the service contractor for CIS & CCNA Support Services under the Office of the M L M Government Chief Information Officer, the Internet Protocol address of the website named “police N website” O (the www.police.gov.hk) P website was address 202.128.238.95 being October 2014. R (2) It was revealed in the log analysis conducted by police officer Wong Ka Chun (PW2) that there were visits S O and 202.128.243.223 in the small hours on the 4th day of Q N P Q R S from Hong Kong Internet Protocol addresses to the T T 3 U 4 5 V See paragraph 5 of the admitted facts in page 10 of the appeal bundle. See paragraph 7 of the admitted facts in page 10 of the appeal bundle. Chapter 221 of the Laws of Hong Kong U V